The tail suspension test: a mouse model of stress reactivity and behavioral despair with genetic variability
H.K. Gershenfeld and X. Liu
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Introduction
The tail suspension test (TST) models "behavioral despair" and is a well-validated
screening test for the behavioral effects of antidepressants in rodents. Remarkably,
this paradigm detects the anti-immobility effects of a wide array of antidepressants,
including tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
(SSRI), monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), electro-convulsive shock (ECS),
and even buproprion and atypical antidepressants.
Aims
This experiment was designed to test for genetic differences in "behavioral
despair" and in imipramine responsivity among inbred mice strains. A second
aim was to examine TST responses as a "stress reactivity" paradigm. We investigated
the relationship between measures of immobility responses in the TST and the
body temperature response following TST (a stress response).
Methods
Eleven inbred strains (129S6/SvEvTac, A/J, AKR/J, Balb/cJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J,
DBA/2J, FVB/NJ, NMRI, SencarA/PtJ and SWR/J) were judiciously selected to represent
the genetic diversity of inbred mouse populations. All mice underwent two trials
of TST: (1) spontaneous, basal TST and (2) imipramine (30 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline
TST. Duration of immobility was recorded during TST in 11 strains, and core
temperature was measured in 4 strains (129S6, A/J, C57BL/6J and NMRI) following
both basal and imipramine/saline TST.
Results
For the 11 strains tested on TST, significant strain differences in immobility
duration were found for both basal TST and imipramine response TST, with heritability
estimates of 0.31 and 0.60 respectively. Immobility duration for the DBA/2J,
FVB/NJ and NMRI strains were significantly reduced for the imipramine groups
compared to their corresponding saline groups. Surprisingly, the reduction of
immobility was independent of the basal immobility (r=-0.06). Using an imipramine
responder (NMRI) and imipramine non-responder (129S6) on TST, blood and brain
leves of imipramine did not significantly differ betweestrains. Significant
strain differences were also found for basal TST-induced hyperthermia, with
NMRI strain showing the highest (38.5 °C) and A/J the lowest (36.5 °C). Imipramine
(30 mg/kg, i.p.) demonstrated significant pharmacological activity in reducing
body temperature in the 129S6 and NMRI strains. Remarkably, imipramine (30 mg/kg,
i.p.) differentially exhibited an anti-immobility effect on TST in only the
NMRI strain, but not the 129S6 strain. Furthermore, in the 129S6 strain, the
TST-induced hyperthermia was selectively blocked with propranolol (10 mg/kg,
i.p.), while this agent had no effect on immobility.
Conclusions
Supported by the UT Southwestern Medical Foundation and the NARSAD Young Investigator's Award (HG).
Paper presented at Measuring Behavior 2000, 3rd International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, 15-18 August 2000, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
© 2000 Noldus Information Technology b.v.