Exploring accelerometry as an objective method to assess daily functioning in migraine
D.L. Stronks1,2, J.H.M. Tulen1, J.B.J. Bussmann3 , L. Pepplinkhuizen1 and J. Passchier2
1Department
of Psychiatry,
2Department of Medical Psychology & Psychotherapy,
3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
University Hospital Rotterdam - Dijkzigt and Erasmus University Rotterdam,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Background
Migraine is a chronic disabling disorder, with paroxysmal attacks of unilateral,
pulsating headache associated with symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. Dependent
upon the intensity of the pain and the duration of the migraine episode, migraine
significantly reduces quality of life and leads to impaired functioning (emotional,
social, behavioral) both at home and at work. The impact of migraine on daily
functioning has presently only been quantified by means of repeated subjective
assessments before, during and after migraine attacks, using daily logs and/or
questionnaires.
Aim
We explored whether ambulatory accelerometry (e.g.[1,2]) by means of a portable
digital recorder (Vitaport2; Temec Instruments b.v., Kerkrade, The Netherlands)
can be used as an objective method to quantify the behavioral aspects of migraine-related
disability.
Methods
Four body mounted uni-axial piezo-resistive accelerometers were used to quantify
the time spent in different body postures (lying, sitting, standing), physical
activities (walking, cycling) and a general index of body motility during 8
migraine attacks and subsequent recovery periods of 6 female migraine patients
(mean age: 39.8 years, range: 29-49) in their habitual environment. The length
of each recording period was approximately 3 days. Two patients used no drugs
for the acute treatment of their migraine attack; the other patients used their
habitual medication. In order to quantify the influence of a migraine episode
on daily activities, we alsperformed measurements during a headache-free baseline
period (2 days) of the same patients.
Results
Within the context of the time required to travel to the patient and attach
the sensors (approximately 60-75 min in this study), the migraine attacks and
recovery periods were monitored. Overall, the procedures functioned well, indicating
that ambulatory accelerometry measurements before, during and after a migraine
attack are feasible to perform. All recorded migraine attacks influenced daily
physical activities as quantified by means of ambulatory accelerometry. A bed
rest-requiring moderate or severe migraine attack showed the following behavioral
changes: the number of postural transitions and the time spent in the standing
position and as movement were reduced, whereas the time spent in the lying position
was increased, versus a corresponding headache-free baseline period. Total body
motility was always reduced during migraine, also in those patients who were
able to continue their daily activities.
Conclusions
Our data suggest that migraine always influences behavior by reducing motility
and that, dependent upon the severity of the attack, effectiveness of acute
treatment, and the time of day, the time spent in various body positions, dynamic
activities, and number of postural transitions are affected. Therefore, ambulatory
accelerometry may provide the objective behavioral effect parameters for the
evaluation of migraine and its treatment on daily functioning in the habitual
environment.
Poster presented at Measuring Behavior 2000, 3rd International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, 15-18 August 2000, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
© 2000 Noldus Information Technology b.v.